Search

Driving strategic financial integration across sports franchise negotiations

 

Early involvement leads to better financial forecasting

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Sports franchises often suffer from a disconnect between front-office executives negotiating contracts and back-office finance teams, who frequently learn about deals only after they're finalized, making it difficult to accurately forecast revenue and track profitability. Early integration of finance into contract negotiations enables better scenario analysis and reporting, which becomes increasingly critical when franchises experience rapid growth from success or ownership changes.

 

In the world of sports franchises and the broader media and entertainment industry, there is a significant gap between the front-office executives negotiating contracts and their back-office counterparts modeling revenue streams and determining how best to account for them. The two parties often do not communicate well, with finance executives learning of ambitious signings and innovative licensing deals only after the ink is dry.

 

Of course, the most visible example of this disconnect is experienced with player contracts, as the confidentiality of those negotiations often can require a relatively closed process. But licensing agreements and vendor deals are similarly hampered by the lack of integration and communication between the front and back offices. 

 

 

 

The consequences of separation 

 

When communications break down and there is a lack of proper collaboration, it becomes difficult to measure profitability, forecast revenue and account for performance obligations. For example, a contract may include the obligation to provide free jerseys, tickets or even travel amenities. Finance has a strong interest in being able to account for such contingencies to track profitability at the appropriate granular level of detail.

 

In addition, third parties are increasingly empowered by contracts to make purchases on behalf of an organization. If finance later needs to answer questions about profitability, they may have to work unnecessarily hard to uncover those associated details because they haven’t accounted for it — nor built it into their respective reporting processes — up front, or are finding out about the purchase only when an invoice or settlement is received. Given that finance is typically a very lean function in sports franchises, this is especially troublesome.

 

Not all contracts are the same. Sometimes contracts above a certain threshold are reviewed by finance. But it is often smaller contracts that contain surprises, such as hidden performance obligations.

 
 

Communication is key

 
 

Better communications — or, better yet, improved integration into the process — would solve many problems. Jon Bell, Grant Thornton Senior Manager, Business Consulting, said, “If the finance and accounting team knows that they need to track against something, they can usually build in a process to do so. But it's truly the unknown piece that creates a lot of noise and friction in the organization.”

 

“Including finance as a trusted partner enables scenario analysis, modeling and other activities that lead to better informed reporting, budgets and forecasts moving forward.”

 

But the benefits of communication aren’t limited to better forecasts and reporting. When finance is brought in early, they can bring a valuable and different perspective. Bell noted, “Sometime I think the front of the house is focused on sales, sales and more sales, and not necessarily on the underlying costs.”  Finance can push back against some things that might be problematic.

 

 

 

Winning comes with new challenges 

 

More so than most brands, sports franchises can acquire value quickly as fan interest surges. While this is what everyone wants, wins on the field and incremental success adds complexity and new challenges as franchises take on more lucrative sponsorships and explore new licensing opportunities. Ownership may even start acquiring additional franchises. 

 

Teams that were run as tight family businesses in the past may shift to a more growth-focused corporate approach. For example, while ownership may have once viewed themselves as custodians of a community asset, they may now view themselves as drivers of investor value. They may be charged with financing new stadiums and developing adjacent properties. Growth means integrating new revenue streams and accounting for new expenses. If solid finance processes that accurately model, forecast and report revenue aren’t in place, they could hinder growth. Ownership changes only exacerbate these shifts. 

 

Since reporting strategies are closely aligned with a business philosophy of ownership, processes and metrics almost surely need be rethought. If they weren’t robust in the first place, that can be even more difficult.  Inefficiencies that a family-owned franchise can live with become magnified when the franchise becomes a part of a larger, faster-moving and more ambitious organization.  

 

Of course, sports have an additional level of integration, or, at least, alignment: the league will require certain financial information to be submitted from each of its constituent teams.

 

“Financial rigor is essential for sports organizations just like any other business,” said Deborah Newman, who leads the Media & Entertainment industry practice for Grant Thornton. “Sports should be fun for the fans and participants, but strong reporting and compliance creates the foundation for a winning result for everyone."

 
 
 

Becoming team players

 
 

Sports is also distinct in another way: the culture of the players on the floor field or rink sets the tone for the entire organization. When sports franchises talk about creating a “culture of winning,” they aren’t being metaphorical.

 

Ideally, there’s a synergy between the team and how the overall business functions. According to Patrick Boruta, Grant Thornton Managing Director, Business Consulting, “All owners push their overall organizations to build a broad culture of winning, which in many cases for the back office means having access to the latest technology and the most efficient business processes. So the team is very successful. That culture tends to have a ripple effect throughout the entire organization, which influences enterprise-wide operations and decision-making.”

 

 

 

From a winning culture to real-time data analysis

 

The change that begins with culture is ideally transformed by leadership into policy. Bell said, “Start at the top with the key metrics you want to measure and what winning looks like and then work backwards to create a data strategy that captures that information in a way that people aren’t having to manually manipulate data to achieve the end result.”

 

That can mean identifying and working with your third-party vendors, incorporating your data strategy into your contract language, sales reporting and invoicing processes. If this is all automated, you can perform very meaningful real-time analyses. 

 

Boruta sees opportunities in “finding synergies with your current business processes, your organizational structure, and your technology and data landscape, while taking the opportunity to explore automation tools available in today’s marketplace that align to your organizational vision and strategic priorities. If a new ERP solution is not the right answer at this time, consider using low-code, no-code automation solutions in order to obtain better real-time data from disparate sources and properly format them to support more robust and accurate internal and league reporting.”

 

 

 

Key takeaways 

 

  • In sports franchises, there is often a significant operational and even cultural gap between finance departments and the front office. Specifically, finance executives are often excluded from contract negotiations. 
  • This exclusion can hamper their ability to model, forecast and report because they are unaware of consequential clauses in contracts with players and vendors. 
  • Better communication, or full integration into the contract negotiation process, would mitigate this. 
  • Sports teams can undergo rapid operational and cultural change as a result of winning or losing. This can be exacerbated by changes of ownership in the form of sales or mergers. The challenge of delivering robust financial metrics becomes more pronounced in these times of organizational change.
  • The key to overcoming this communication gap is strong leadership that sets clear metrics, which can be translated into scalable processes and real-time, technology-enabled analysis.
 
 

Contacts:

 
 
 

Los Angeles, California

Industries

  • Technology, Media & Telecommunications
  • Media & Entertainment
 

Content disclaimer

This Grant Thornton Advisors LLC content provides information and comments on current issues and developments. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the subject matter covered. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. All relevant facts and circumstances, including the pertinent authoritative literature, need to be considered to arrive at conclusions that comply with matters addressed in this content.

Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.

For additional information on topics covered in this content, contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC professional.

 

 

Tax professional standards statement

This content supports Grant Thornton Advisors LLC’s marketing of professional services and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. If you are interested in the topics presented herein, we encourage you to contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional. Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein.

The information contained herein is general in nature and is based on authorities that are subject to change. It is not, and should not be construed as, accounting, legal, tax, or professional advice provided by Grant Thornton Advisors LLC. This material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of tax and nontax factors not described herein. Contact a Grant Thornton Advisors LLC tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information.

 

Changes in tax laws or other factors could affect, on a prospective or retroactive basis, the information contained herein; Grant Thornton Advisors LLC assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any such changes. All references to “Section,” “Sec.,” or “§” refer to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


Grant Thornton Advisors LLC and its subsidiary entities are not licensed CPA firms.

 

Trending topics